Main Article Content
The article conducts an interpretative review of contemporary scientific literature (2000–2026) to analyse the environmental aspects of conventional funeral practices and introduces sustainable burial cemetery models such as green cemetery and conservation burial grounds. The interdisciplinary literature review covers landscape architecture, urban planning, urban ecology, environmental sciences, and sustainable development research. The ecological memorial landscapes, which promote human biomass “return” back into biological cycles, could create ecosystems that merge into urban green infrastructure networks, and transform the end-of-life into an active mechanism for environmental preservation. City planners and landscape architects are uniquely positioned to promote this sustainable model by reimagining and zoning cemeteries as urban green infrastructure. This study suggests that despite legal, religious, and cultural barriers, the rise of eco burial practices signals a generational evolution and shift toward ecological accountability and “death positivity” movement.
Article Details
Afangideh, C. B., & Udokpoh, U. U. (2022). Environmental impact assessment of groundwater pollution within cemetery surroundings. Indian Journal of Engineering, 19(51), 100–115. https://www.discoveryjournals.org/engineering/current_issue/2022/v19/n51/A8.pdf
Andersson, E., Barthel, S., & Ahrné, K. (2007). Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecological Applications, 17(5), 1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1116.1 (Crossref)
Clayden, A., Green, T., Hockey, J., & Powell, M. (2018). Cutting the lawn – Natural burial and its contribution to the delivery of ecosystem services in urban cemeteries. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 33, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.012 (Crossref)
Coutts, C., Basmajian, C., Sehee, J., Kelty, S., & Williams, P. C. (2018). Natural burial as a land conservation tool in the US. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178, 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.022 (Crossref)
Długoński, A., Dushkova, D., & Haase, D. (2022). Urban cemeteries – Places of multiple diversity and challenges. A case study from Łódź (Poland) and Leipzig (Germany). Land, 11(5), 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050677 (Crossref)
Długozima, A., Kosiacka-Beck, E. (2020). How to Enhance the Environmental Values of Contemporary Cemeteries in an Urban Context. Sustainability, 12(6), 2374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062374 (Crossref)
Długozima, A., Kosiacka-Beck, E. & Krzykawska, K. (2024). Multiuse cemetery paradigm: cemetery as a multifunctional place of social significance – reshaping a cemetery in the urban space of Eastern Europe. Cities, 156, 105556. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105556 (Crossref)
Długozima, A., Kosiacka-Beck, E. & Krzykawska, K. (2026). Cemetery as multifaceted space with leisure uses in the urban American and Western European context. Leisure Studies, 45(2), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2024.2428344 (Crossref)
Ezenwa, I. M., Omoigberale, M., Abulu, R., Biose, E., Okpara, B., & Uyi, O. (2023). Burial leakage: A human accustomed groundwater contaminant sources and health hazards study near cemeteries in Benin City, Nigeria. PLOS ONE, 18(12), e0292008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292008 (Crossref)
Fischer, N. (2025). Landscape and Remembrance of the Dead. In O. Kühne et al. (Eds), Landscape Handbook: German Language Research Perspectives (pp. 467–474). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83147-8_40 (Crossref)
Francis, D. (2003). Cemeteries as cultural landscapes. Mortality, 8(2), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357627031000087442 (Crossref)
Gonçalves, V., Albuquerque, A., Carvalho, P., Almeida, P., & Cavaleiro, V. (2023). Groundwater vulnerability assessment to cemeteries pollution through GIS-based DRASTIC index. Water, 15(4), 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040812 (Crossref)
Gould, J., Nissenbaum, M., & Turner, J. (2024). Dying “Buddhish”: Death, Diversity, and Worldview Complexity in and Beyond Australia. Journal of Global Buddhism, 25(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.26034/lu.jgb.2024.4861 (Crossref)
Green Burial Council [GBC]. (2021). Opening, Closing, and Maintenance of a Green Burial Grave. https://www.greenburialcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/opening_closing_and_maintenance_of_a_green_burial_grave.pdf
Hong, J. (2025). Designing an ecological death: Rethinking funeral systems through ecological design (Master’s thesis). Delft University of Technology.
Ibrahim, M. A., Petersson, M., Åström, M., & Johansson, M. (2023). Physical environmental hazards associated with the Swedish death care industry. Safety Science, 165, 106195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106195 (Crossref)
Itescu, Y., & Jeschke, J. M. (2024). Assessing the conservation value of cemeteries to urban biota worldwide. Conservation Biology, 38(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14322 (Crossref)
Jaszczak, A., Kostecki, J., Pochodyła-Ducka, E., & Greinert, A. (2026). Cemeteries as sustainable elements of urban green space: Legal, ecological, and spatial perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe. Sustainability, 18, 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010212 (Crossref)
Keijzer, E. (2017). The environmental impact of activities after life: Life cycle assessment of funerals. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(5), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1183-9 (Crossref)
Király, G., & Köves, A. (2023). Facing finitude: Death-awareness and sustainable transitions. Ecological Economics, 205, 107712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107712 (Crossref)
Lima, B. B. M. e R., Marini, A. F., Manhães, A. J. P., Sales, D. S. da, Guimarães, H. A., Sales, C. M. R., & Correia, V. G. (2025). Cemeteries and environmental contamination: Strategies for control, monitoring and remediation. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 19(10), e013549. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v19n10-018 (Crossref)
Löki, V., Deák, B., Lukács, A. B., & Molnár, V. A. (2019). Biodiversity potential of burial places – A review on the flora and fauna of cemeteries and churchyards. Global Ecology and Conservation, 18, e00614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00614 (Crossref)
McClymont, K., & Sinnett, D. (2021). Planning cemeteries: Their potential contribution to green infrastructure and ecosystem services. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3, 789925. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.789925 (Crossref)
Menchetelli, V., & Dottorini, E. (2025). The cemetery landscape as a complex value. Understanding, documenting, and enhancing a liminal cultural heritage. Disegnarecon, 18(35). https://doi.org/10.20365/disegnarecon.35.2025.21
Moisseeff, M. (2021). Dealing with death in contemporary Western culture: A view from afar. In G. Harvey, M. Houseman, S. M. Pike & J. Salomonsen (Eds), Reassembling Democracy: Ritual as Cultural Resource (pp. 179–192). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350123045.ch-010 (Crossref)
Mordhorst, A., Zimmermann, I., Fleige, H., & Horn, R. (2022). Environmental risk of (heavy) metal release from urns into cemetery soils. Science of the Total Environment, 817, 152952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152952 (Crossref)
Neckel, A., Toscan, P. C., Kujawa, H. A., Bodah, B. W., Korcelski, C., Maculan, L. S., Silva, C. C. O. A., Gonçalves Junior, A. C., Snak, A., Dal Moro, L., & Silva, L. F. O. (2023). Hazardous elements in urban cemeteries and possible architectural design solutions for a more sustainable environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 50675–50689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25891-z (Crossref)
Nosi, C., D’Agostino, A., Ceccotti, F., & Sfodera, F. (2024). Green funerals: Technological innovations and societal shifts toward sustainable death care practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 207, 123644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123644 (Crossref)
Ojo, O. A., Oyelami, C. A., Fakunle, M. A., Ogundana, A. K., Ajayi, O. E., & Uche, T. E. (2022). Integrated approach to unsaturated zone characterization as it relates to burial practices and its impact on the immediate environment. Heliyon, 8(7), e09831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09831 (Crossref)
Pawlett, M., Girkin, N. T., Deeks, L., Evans, D. L., Sakrabani, R., Masters, P., Garnett, K., & Marquez-Grant, N. (2024). The contribution of natural burials to soil ecosystem services: Review and emergent research questions. Applied Soil Ecology, 194, 105200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105200 (Crossref)
Ponce Arguello, M., Crisanto-Perrazo, T., Vizuete, D., Ocaña Garzón, E., Guevara Garcia, P., Aldás, M. B., Jaramillo, S., & Toulkeridis, T. (2024). Evaluation of water contamination caused by cemeteries in Central Ecuador – A warning for the authorities. Water, 16(16), 2310. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16162310 (Crossref)
Radomska, M. (2023). Ecologies of death, ecologies of mourning: Towards more-than-human grief in the Anthropocene. Environmental Humanities, 15(2), 312–329. (Crossref)
Rugg, J. (2000). Defining the place of burial: What makes a cemetery a cemetery? Mortality, 5(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/713686011 (Crossref)
Säumel, I., Butenschoen, S., & Kreibig, N. (2023). Gardens of life: Multifunctional and ecosystem services of urban cemeteries in Central Europe and beyond – Historical, structural, planning, nature and heritage conservation aspects. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1077565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1077565 (Crossref)
Sallay, Á., Gecséné Tar, I., Mikházi, Z., Takács, K., Furlan, C., & Krippner, U. (2023). The role of urban cemeteries in ecosystem services and habitat protection. Plants, 12(6), 1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061269 (Crossref)
Sallay, Á., Mikházi, Z., Gecséné Tar, I., & Takács, K. (2022). Cemeteries as a part of green infrastructure and tourism. Sustainability, 14(5), 2918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052918 (Crossref)
Shelvock, M., Kinsella, E. A., & Harris, D. (2022). Beyond the corporatization of death systems: Towards green death practices. Illness, Crisis & Loss, 30(4), 640–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/10541373211006882 (Crossref)
Slominski, E. M. (2023). Life of the death system: Shifting regimes, evolving practices, and the rise of eco-funerals. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 19(1), 2243779. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2023.2243779 (Crossref)
Stock, P. V., & Dennis, M. K. (2023). Up in smoke or down with worms? older adult environmentalist’s discourse on disposal, dispersal, and (green) burial. Mortality, 28(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2021.1878121 (Crossref)
Straka, T. M., Mischo, M., Petrick, K. J., & Kowarik, I. (2022). Urban cemeteries as shared habitats for people and nature: Reasons for visit, comforting experiences of nature, and preferences for cultural and natural features. Land, 11(8), 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081237 (Crossref)
Villaseñor, N. R., & Escobar, M. A. H. (2019). Cemeteries and biodiversity conservation in cities: How do landscape and patch-level attributes influence bird diversity in urban park cemeteries? Urban Ecosystems, 23, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00877-3 (Crossref)
Webster, L. (2016). The science behind green burial. Green Burial Council. https://www.greenburialcouncil.org/science_green_burial.html
Webster, L. (2023). Exchanging gifts: Natural burial is a conservation strategy. Land Trust Alliance.
Wilson, E., Caswell, G., Turner, N., & Pollock, K. (2024). Talking about death and dying: Findings from deliberative discussion groups with members of the public. Mortality, 29(1), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2022.2136515 (Crossref)
Yarwood, R., Sidaway, J. D., Kelly, C., & Stillwell, S. (2015). Sustainable deathstyles? The geography of green burials in Britain. The Geographical Journal, 181, 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12087 (Crossref)
Yu, Q. F. (2024). A study on the relationship between sustainable development strategies in the funeral industry and eco-friendly natural burials. Advances in Management & Applied Economics, 14(6), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.47260/amae/1468 (Crossref)
Downloads

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.